Tr?id=566623520170033&ev=PageView&noscript=1

Ä¢¹½´«Ã½

SEC Panel Calls for Tighter Limits on RIAs' Mandatory Arbitration Clauses

Posted on July 2nd, 2025 at 2:16 PM
SEC Panel Calls for Tighter Limits on RIAs' Mandatory Arbitration Clauses

From the desk of Jim Eccleston at Ä¢¹½´«Ã½

AdvisorHub reports that the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Investor Advisory Committee has finalized a recommendation urging the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) to rein in the use of mandatory arbitration clauses by registered investment advisers (“RIA”s). After raising concerns over two years ago, the committee voted to formally advise the SEC to improve fairness and transparency in how customer disputes are handled.

The recommendation outlines four key actions. First, the SEC should align arbitration standards for RIAs with existing Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) rules governing broker-dealers. Those rules prohibit class action waivers and require arbitration hearings to take place near the client’s residence.

Second, RIAs should notify clients of any mandatory arbitration clauses and disclose arbitration outcomes. The committee also called for a requirement that RIAs include arbitration provisions within their Form ADV disclosures. Third, the SEC should establish a publicly accessible, searchable database of arbitration awards for RIAs, similar to FINRA’s existing arbitration records and BrokerCheck disclosures for broker-dealers.

Finally, the committee urged the SEC to investigate RIA arbitration practices further and produce educational resources to help investors understand arbitration procedures and identify key questions to raise with their advisers.

As reported by AdvisorHub, the recommendations follow a 2023 study examining 579 advisory agreements. The findings revealed that 61 percent contained mandatory arbitration clauses, with several including troubling provisions — such as requiring customers to bear arbitration costs, limiting potential damages, or restricting types of claims. Notably, 97 percent of these agreements failed to factor in the client’s location when selecting hearing venues.

Although the Investor Advisory Committee does not set regulatory policy, it made clear that applying consistent arbitration protections across both investment advisers and brokerage firms aligns with an adviser’s fiduciary duty to act in the client’s best interest, according to AdvisorHub.

 

Ä¢¹½´«Ã½ LLC represents investors and financial advisors nationwide in securities, employment, transition, regulatory, and disciplinary matters.

Tags: eccleston, eccleston law, sec

Return to Archive

TESTIMONIALS

Previous
Next
Quotes Bigger

Thank you for your professional assistance with this matter. You are very good at what you do.

John T.

LATEST NEWS AND ARTICLES

1786734880 Law
August 14, 2026
Cash Sweep Litigation Continues to Drive Legal Costs

Cash sweep litigation continues to increase legal costs for wealth management firms despite the Securities and Exchange Commission's (SEC) decision under the Trump administration to close pending investigations without imposing enforcement penalties, according to AdvisorHub.

1786636784 Law
August 13, 2026
FINRA Orders Centaurus Financial to Pay $1.1 Million Over Variable Annuity Supervision Failures

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has ordered Centaurus Financial Inc.

1786553985 Law
August 12, 2026
Proposed FINRA Enforcement Reforms Draw Mixed Reactions From Industry Participants

A new report recommending changes to the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority's (FINRA) enforcement program has generated mixed reactions from investor advocates, securities attorneys and industry professionals, according to ThinkAdvisor.