Tr?id=566623520170033&ev=PageView&noscript=1

Ä¢¹½´«Ã½

SEC Imposes Fines on Advisors for Regulation best Interest (Reg BI) Violations

Posted on January 3rd, 2024 at 11:52 AM
SEC Imposes Fines on Advisors for Regulation best Interest (Reg BI) Violations

From the desk of Jim Eccleston at Eccleston Law 

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has sanctioned two Laidlaw advisors, Richard Michalski and Michael Murray, for violating Regulation Best Interest's care obligation by making recommendations to four retail customers without a reasonable basis.

The SEC order states that the advisors did not have a reasonable basis to believe that the recommended transactions concerning the customers' investment profiles were not excessive. Additionally, the recommendations allegedly prioritized the financial interests of the registered representatives over the interests of the retail customers, thus violating the "quantitative prong" of Regulation Best Interest's care obligation.

According to ThinkAdvisor, the SEC has mandated Laidlaw to pay a total of $822,884.58, including disgorgement of $547,712.36, prejudgment interest of $51,844.22, and civil penalties of $223,328, as a consequence of its failure to supervise the representatives, Michalski and Murray.

Both Michalski and Murray received censures. Michalski faced a six-month suspension from association with any broker, dealer, investment advisor, municipal securities dealer, municipal advisor, transfer agent, or nationally recognized statistical rating organization. Additionally, he was required to pay a civil money penalty of $44,253 to the SEC.

Murray was directed to pay disgorgement of $88,506 and prejudgment interest of $4,260.55, totaling $92,766.55. He was further ordered to pay an additional disgorgement of $24,414.17, prejudgment interest of $1,143.91, totaling $25,558.08, and a civil money penalty of $20,000.

 

Ä¢¹½´«Ã½ LLC represents investors and financial advisors nationwide in securities, employment, transition, regulatory, and disciplinary matters.

Tags: eccleston, eccleston law, sec

Return to Archive

TESTIMONIALS

Previous
Next
Quotes Bigger

Ä¢¹½´«Ã½ just wanted to say thanks for your work in helping us get back some of the money we lost. Ä¢¹½´«Ã½ are not by any means rich, but we have saved some money and we have done so through a tight-fisted approach to most everything we do. So losing a significant chunk of money hurt…especially at a time when everyone else was growing their accounts. Ä¢¹½´«Ã½ really appreciate the work you did.

Allan and Adele

LATEST NEWS AND ARTICLES

1786980584 Law
August 17, 2026
Federal Judge Allows Investor Class Action Over Lightstone REIT Disclosures to Proceed

A federal judge has allowed investors to proceed with a class-action lawsuit alleging that directors and advisors of three Lightstone Value Plus REITs failed to disclose a significant conflict of interest before shareholders voted on amendments extending the funds' operating periods.

1786734880 Law
August 14, 2026
Cash Sweep Litigation Continues to Drive Legal Costs

Cash sweep litigation continues to increase legal costs for wealth management firms despite the Securities and Exchange Commission's (SEC) decision under the Trump administration to close pending investigations without imposing enforcement penalties, according to AdvisorHub.

1786636784 Law
August 13, 2026
FINRA Orders Centaurus Financial to Pay $1.1 Million Over Variable Annuity Supervision Failures

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has ordered Centaurus Financial Inc.