Tr?id=566623520170033&ev=PageView&noscript=1

Ä¢¹½´«Ã½

Federal Judge Rejects Vanguard’s $40 Million Class Settlement, Citing Better Outcome Under SEC Deal

Posted on May 23rd, 2025 at 3:00 PM
Federal Judge Rejects Vanguard’s $40 Million Class Settlement, Citing Better Outcome Under SEC Deal

From the Desk of Jim Eccleston at Ä¢¹½´«Ã½

A federal judge has rejected a proposed $40 million class-action settlement with Vanguard, finding that the deal offered little to no real value to harmed investors compared to a separate settlement the firm reached with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), according to Barron’s.

The dispute originated after corporate retirement plans moved out of Vanguard’s target-date funds in favor of lower-cost institutional options. This shift left retail investors with unexpected capital gains tax liabilities. Vanguard initially agreed to settle the resulting class action for $40 million, allocating over $13 million for plaintiffs’ attorneys’ fees. The U.S. District Court had granted preliminary approval of the settlement before new facts emerged.

Around the same time, Vanguard entered into a $135 million remediation agreement with the SEC and several state regulators for the same conduct. Notably, that agreement allowed Vanguard to reduce its SEC payment by $40 million if the court approved the class settlement. In effect, Vanguard’s total payout remained $135 million, but approval of the class settlement would divert a significant portion of the sum to attorneys’ fees, reducing the investors’ recovery.

As reported by Barron's, the court called this a “strange situation” and highlighted that rejecting the class settlement would result in a greater recovery for the investors through the SEC fund-- without deductions for legal fees and without requiring class members to waive any claims.

Following additional argument and briefing, Judge Murphy concluded that the proposed class settlement was neither fair, reasonable, nor adequate. He noted that approval would have primarily benefitted Vanguard and class counsel at the expense of the investors. By rejecting the deal, the court preserved investors' rights and guaranteed them at least the same financial recovery through the SEC agreement. 

The court has ordered the parties to file a status report by May 30.

Ä¢¹½´«Ã½ LLC represents investors and financial advisors nationwide in securities, employment, transition, regulatory, and disciplinary matters.

Tags: Eccleston, Ä¢¹½´«Ã½

Return to Archive

TESTIMONIALS

Previous
Next
Quotes Bigger

Ä¢¹½´«Ã½ just wanted to say thanks for your work in helping us get back some of the money we lost. Ä¢¹½´«Ã½ are not by any means rich, but we have saved some money and we have done so through a tight-fisted approach to most everything we do. So losing a significant chunk of money hurt…especially at a time when everyone else was growing their accounts. Ä¢¹½´«Ã½ really appreciate the work you did.

Allan and Adele

LATEST NEWS AND ARTICLES

1786734880 Law
August 14, 2026
Cash Sweep Litigation Continues to Drive Legal Costs

Cash sweep litigation continues to increase legal costs for wealth management firms despite the Securities and Exchange Commission's (SEC) decision under the Trump administration to close pending investigations without imposing enforcement penalties, according to AdvisorHub.

1786636784 Law
August 13, 2026
FINRA Orders Centaurus Financial to Pay $1.1 Million Over Variable Annuity Supervision Failures

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has ordered Centaurus Financial Inc.

1786553985 Law
August 12, 2026
Proposed FINRA Enforcement Reforms Draw Mixed Reactions From Industry Participants

A new report recommending changes to the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority's (FINRA) enforcement program has generated mixed reactions from investor advocates, securities attorneys and industry professionals, according to ThinkAdvisor.